EcoPack
Italy & EU foodservice packaging
Updates on foodservice packaging, material choices, product selection, compliance reminders and market changes.
2026-03-08
Biodegradable and compostable do not describe the same packaging outcome. The practical distinction depends on the conditions required for breakdown, the certification behind the claim, the disposal route available locally and whether the packaging still fits the foodservice use case.
Read article →
2026-03-07
Compostable packaging depends on certification scope, local collection and treatment routes, food-use conditions and commercial fit. It should not be selected by material name alone.
Read article →
2026-03-06
Sustainable packaging depends on cost, performance, use case and real disposal route. Material names alone are not enough to judge whether a format fits a business.
Read article →
2026-03-05
Sustainable packaging in 2026 is judged less by abstract labels alone and more by whether the material can be sourced, used, collected and disposed of in a realistic way. Reduction, reuse and clearer disposal logic are becoming more important than symbolic environmental wording.
Read article →
2026-03-04
Plastic and paper packaging cannot be judged well through one universal sustainability claim. The more useful comparison looks at food application, transport distance, moisture and grease exposure, disposal routes and whether the packaging structure fits real use conditions.
Read article →
2026-03-03
Packaging-related emissions are shaped by more than the raw material alone. Foodservice companies usually get a clearer picture when they review material choice, pack weight, sourcing distance, filling efficiency, reuse potential and end-of-life assumptions together.
Read article →If you already have a packaging type in mind, return to products to check categories, specifications, samples and quote options.